On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:23:47PM -0400, Jason Tang wrote: >> The only problem being that this release is incompatible with current >> nvidia drivers. Granted, I'm aware of the Fedora position regarding >> non-OSS, but this Xorg issue has completely destroyed many user's >> confidence in the dev team. >> >> Most users could care less about supposed 'valid' reasons - that fact >> is: No 3D acceleration == No F9 adoption (or worse, an eroding user >> base). Lets not play this game with F10. > > Well I'm an Intel & Radeon user and Xorg in F9 is dramatically better > better for all my machines. So, yes, if new code improves life for the > open source drivers, lets do this again & again in future releaes. I don't > want my desktop experiance held hostage by one company with binary drivers. > I chose hardware which is supportable so I can get the best & latest open > source has to offer. Why the H.E. double hockey sticks do people think proving compatibility packages for nVidia users will somehow hold the desktop hostage for everyone else? I do not understand why ajax could not provide compatibility rpms for nVidia users? Is he not paid by redhat? I mean just how difficult can it be to provide F8 xorg rpms on F9 for nVidia users?? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
