Re: Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Stone wrote:
And I don't see why you can't have two different xorg packages.  We
have other compat packages with gcc and libstdc++, etc...

Those are very different beasts. If you have two different libstdc++ packages other packages will depend on one or the other of them. If you have two different X Servers packages need to run on both of them. Even if there aren't compile time changes that require packages to be ported to support both versions (or be compiled twice to each set of libraries) you still have the QA and support burden of making sure each of those packages run on either one of the X Servers.

-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux