Mike Cronenworth wrote:
Most people who would want to use a video editor for "realistic work" wouldn't find much value in an Ogg-only output format. They'd expect to be able to output in MPEG-2, MPEG-4, or h.264 to display on their televisions and/or share with customers or friends through the Internet. Sure, you could output into a non-patent encumbered format and then re-encode the video, but that's a two step process. Not very user friendly; plus if it is a lossy codec it's a degrading process.
If you can output any format that youtube/flickr/etc can consume you have something that is useful to a lot of people. If they're not currently accepting ogg, this would be a worthwhile effort to campaign for.
-- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
