On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:10 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:07 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure that's strong enough. It should clearly state that the > > package maintainer is responsible for getting bugs fixed -- if the > > package maintainer isn't a coder, then they need to take a more > > managerial röle; working with upstream or with code-monkeys within > > Fedora to get things fixed. How about this: > > Do we need to make an effort to catalog skillsets in the contributor > base? to make it easier to help maintainers find a particular sort of > code-monkey? Yes, perhaps. Or maybe it would be better to have a code-monkey sign up as co-maintainer for the package, where the primary maintainer isn't capable of actually..., well, maintaining the package. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
