Re: Maintainer Responsibility Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 09:12 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Yeah.  I think it's worthwhile to mention something like this:
> 
> "Even bugs that you aren't capable of fixing yourself because they deal 
> with intricacies of the source code that you don't have the knowledge to 
> fix deserve a few moments of your time.  You can report the bug upstream 
> for the user, ask for help from more code-oriented people on 
> fedora-devel, or check whether other distros have patches for the 
> problem.  Always be sure to post to the bug report what you have done so 
> that the reporter has a proper expectation of whether you're working on 
> a fix or if it's something that has to wait on upstream action."

Added. Thanks for the suggestion, Toshio.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux