On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 08:16 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >>> Stripping of pathname-based and package-name based dependencies I can > >>> understand, but not the library deps. > >> Are they the same across all RPM based systems? > >> > > > > The library deps sorta have to be. The deps come out of what the program > > is linked to. > > > > as an example run: > > ldd /usr/bin/xterm > > > > and look at what it outputs > > > > VMWare-server should probably be split into two packages. Only the > console portion needs the X libs and you can run it on a different > machine, a different OS, or not at all, so it wouldn't make much sense > for a run-time dependency for that part to prevent installation of the > rest of the server. umm, okay. But no one here controls the vmware package. Hell, speaking for just me, I don't even CARE about vmware. So, if you really think the above should happen, tell vmware. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
