Paul Howarth wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
> I think we are all actually in violent agreement here, it's just
that some proprietary vendors seem to go out of their way to defeat
the dependency mechanisms that would help tools like yum install
their software.
Have you looked at what packages have to include to install on more
than one linux distro/version? And fedora is the worst of the bunch
in terms of not being compatible with last week's version of itself.
Give the 3rd party packagers a target before you complain about them
missing it.
As Kevin mentioned earlier in this thread, the soname dependencies that
RPM adds automatically are *real* dependencies and I'm not aware of any
RPM-based distribution that doesn't use them. So what's the point of
stripping them out?
Stripping of pathname-based and package-name based dependencies I can
understand, but not the library deps.
Are they the same across all RPM based systems?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
