Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:21:36PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > Some or all of those things seem ideal to actually live in user desktop
> > configuration hooey of some sort instead of static system-wide X server
> > setup, so maybe the glorious road leads in that direction?
> 
> In fact, yes, yes it does.  See the new gnome-display-properties in F9
> for some of the bits of user-configured dual-head magic.  Thanks to ssp
> for doing the hard work there.

Right now I need xorg.conf for these things on my desktop Radeon X600 
and also my i965 laptop chip:

Option      "AccelMethod" "EXA"

So XVideo works and Render accel works.

Virtual 3200 1600

So dual-head actually has somewhere to put the second head :-)

Various options for touchpad, so I can tap-to-click and drag.

Oh, and per-user dual-head/Xinerama configuration doesn't seem to work 
so well when the window manager or session manager loads before the 
dual-head is configured, resulting in all your icons, applications, 
and gnome-panels being restored overlapped on a single-head.

But you probably knew about all these problems already...If you'd like 
bugs filed, let me know.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux