Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 20:19 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > *) Profit :-)
> 
> That means automagical dual-head just works, a way to choose Xinerama, and
> a way to set the "my second head is 1050 lines high and its bottom line is
> the one adjacent to the bottom line of the 1200-line first head" magic
> knobs, right?
> 
> Oh yeah, and to set DontZap before two weeks go by to disseminate a good
> quarter of my brain into various volatile bits of the session and then I
> type C-something M-DEL too quickly and fly into that particular biannual
> homicidal rage.
> 
> Some or all of those things seem ideal to actually live in user desktop
> configuration hooey of some sort instead of static system-wide X server
> setup, so maybe the glorious road leads in that direction?

In fact, yes, yes it does.  See the new gnome-display-properties in F9
for some of the bits of user-configured dual-head magic.  Thanks to ssp
for doing the hard work there.

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux