Re: is xorg.conf still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> *) Profit :-)

That means automagical dual-head just works, a way to choose Xinerama, and
a way to set the "my second head is 1050 lines high and its bottom line is
the one adjacent to the bottom line of the 1200-line first head" magic
knobs, right?

Oh yeah, and to set DontZap before two weeks go by to disseminate a good
quarter of my brain into various volatile bits of the session and then I
type C-something M-DEL too quickly and fly into that particular biannual
homicidal rage.

Some or all of those things seem ideal to actually live in user desktop
configuration hooey of some sort instead of static system-wide X server
setup, so maybe the glorious road leads in that direction?


Thanks,
Roland

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux