On 4/28/08, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51:46PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:02:11 +0200, Patrice Dumas scripst: > > > It is already the case. The rule is more or less, bring it to the lists > > > and then to fesco. But this is costly so having propoer guidelines to > > > follow like AWOL are better. > > > > Sure, but FESCO seems to be a little overloaded with just general > > leadership stuff (deciding about features, etc.). > > That's exactly my point. For such issues, a specific guideline which > allows not to involve FESCo would be better. I respectfully disagree. A _better_ solution would be for FESCo to spend less time deciding features, and more time focusing on community issues and development. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
