Re: Orphaning package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:48:18 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > On 26.04.2008 11:02, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > >
> > > In the past, somebody from the old FESCO would have looked into it and
> > > would have tried to talk to you and the people you have problems with.
> > > Nowadays, there should also be somebody in the Fedora community or in
> > > Fedora leadership with interest in keeping people happy and
> > > cooperative.
> > 
> > Why can't FESCo handle that instead of discussing Fetures over and over?
> > That how it afaics was supposed to be, as everyone wanted to keep FESCo
> > when the merge happened because most people back then liked the work
> > FESCO did (it IMHO could have been a lot better, but that's a different
> > issue).
> 
> FESCo can't help if it doesn't know there is a problem.  This is the
> first time I've heard of these issues.

That's why I asked _two_ questions. Deleted by Thorsten in the quote,
however.

-- 
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux 2.6.23.15-137.fc8
loadavg: 1.16 1.17 1.07

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux