On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 11:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 26.04.2008 11:02, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > In the past, somebody from the old FESCO would have looked into it and > > would have tried to talk to you and the people you have problems with. > > Nowadays, there should also be somebody in the Fedora community or in > > Fedora leadership with interest in keeping people happy and > > cooperative. > > Why can't FESCo handle that instead of discussing Fetures over and over? > That how it afaics was supposed to be, as everyone wanted to keep FESCo > when the merge happened because most people back then liked the work > FESCO did (it IMHO could have been a lot better, but that's a different > issue). FESCo does handle these disputes (like we have in the past), when we are actually made aware that there is a problem. As far as I'm aware no one in FESCo was ever contacted. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
