Re: FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51:46PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:02:11 +0200, Patrice Dumas scripst:
> > It is already the case. The rule is more or less, bring it to the lists
> > and then to fesco. But this is costly so having propoer guidelines to
> > follow like AWOL are better.
> 
> Sure, but FESCO seems to be a little overloaded with just general 
> leadership stuff (deciding about features, etc.).

That's exactly my point. For such issues, a specific guideline which
allows not to involve FESCo would be better.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux