On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 11:04 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:08:56AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > > > > Hmm why is it costly ? I've had a few conflicts resolved that way, and in a > > reasonably speedy fashion. I don't think I've ever seen a call for help on > > fedora-devel-list going unanswered... > > It doesn't scale. I sent my personal experience in > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-February/msg00496.html > since then some bugs have been closed, but not all and I certainly reopened > at least the same number of similar bugs getting unhandled. And remember > how Michael Schwendt reacted to having his rightly reported bugs to be > closed. > > Reporting the bugs packagers don't care about on the fedora-devel list > or to fesco is not right. Ther should be a way to oblige maintainers > without bothering everyone. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers Please feel free to help make this better. > -- > Pat > -- Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
