Re: FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:08:56AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
>
> Hmm why is it costly ? I've had a few conflicts resolved that way, and in a 
> reasonably speedy fashion. I don't think I've ever seen a call for help on 
> fedora-devel-list going unanswered...

It doesn't scale. I sent my personal experience in 
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-February/msg00496.html
since then some bugs have been closed, but not all and I certainly reopened 
at least the same number of similar bugs getting unhandled. And remember 
how Michael Schwendt reacted to having his rightly reported bugs to be
closed.

Reporting the bugs packagers don't care about on the fedora-devel list
or to fesco is not right. Ther should be a way to oblige maintainers
without bothering everyone.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux