On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:11:33PM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > Perhaps the AWOL maintainer policy could be adapted/extended into a > "non-responsive" maintainer policy. Not caring about a package is not a > mark against the maintainer, but allowing it to bitrot is. I don't think that the AWOL maintainer policy should be extended to cope with these cases, since it seems to me to be a distinct case. But it could certainly be adapted to have a procedure for forced co-maintainership or forced orphaning when a packager doesn't handle the easy to fix/proposed solution bugs in a given time. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
