On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 00:23 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > The first one is, in my opinion, a contributor killer issue and I have > been reporting it more than once. It is not acceptable to have packagers > not handling rapidly bugs where submitter proposes patches, or volunteer > to take care of the issue. FESCo should really come up with a guideline > or a solution for such issues, which is not a case-by-case decision. > It is especially frustrating when a contributor has done some work and > still the package maintainer doesn't seems to care at all about it. Perhaps the AWOL maintainer policy could be adapted/extended into a "non-responsive" maintainer policy. Not caring about a package is not a mark against the maintainer, but allowing it to bitrot is. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
