Re: CLA is broken (was: Re: packages without internet source in fedora)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:49 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> But the contributor is supposed to sign it, supposedly without
> getting a legal advice.

Where do we state, suggest, encourage, hint that you should sign it
without getting legal advice?  Seriously?


-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux