Legal advice (was Re: CLA is broken)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:49 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > But the contributor is supposed to sign it, supposedly without
> > getting a legal advice.
> 
> Where do we state, suggest, encourage, hint that you should sign it
> without getting legal advice?  Seriously?

nowere, of course.  Sorry for implying that.

Let me put is this way:

1) I'd be interested to learn how many of the Fedora contributors got
a legal advice about it before they signed it.

2) If the CLA were so simple that most developers were able to
understand it without getting a legal advice, that would lower the
enter barrier and thus would present a competitive advantage.
(No, I do not imply it is possible, I'm just dreaming.)

Stepan

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux