Lubomir Kundrak wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:53 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Lubomir Kundrak wrote: >>> Why not? Getting rid of legacy cruft sounds like an brilliantly elegant >>> solution to me. But probably not applicable here, as GCJ doesn't really >>> fall into that category, given it still outperforms OpenJDK by the >>> factor of 10 on ppc. >> If you can find something it will run besides whatever benchmark you >> used for that measurement... And will OpenJDK run OpenNMS? > > The "benchmark" I used was compiling OpenJDK itself on ppc. The speed ratio between gcj's interpreter and OpenJDK's C++ interpreter varies depending on the load, but always seems to be in favour of gcj by a ratio of at least 1.6. gcj precompilation improves that a lot, as you might expect, and the code I've tried runs about 10 times faster when precompiled on gcj than on OpenJDK's C++ interpreter. We're working on improving OpenJDK's performance on ppc and other Fedora arches. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
