Re: More Java guidelines questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:53 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > 
> > Why not? Getting rid of legacy cruft sounds like an brilliantly elegant
> > solution to me. But probably not applicable here, as GCJ doesn't really
> > fall into that category, given it still outperforms OpenJDK by the
> > factor of 10 on ppc.
> 
> If you can find something it will run besides whatever benchmark you 
> used for that measurement...  And will OpenJDK run  OpenNMS?

The "benchmark" I used was compiling OpenJDK itself on ppc.

-- 
Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux