Re: More Java guidelines questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lubomir Kundrak wrote:

Or ugly solution -- wait two months ;-) Then all supported Fedoras will have JDK.

No, I am not serious.

Why not? Getting rid of legacy cruft sounds like an brilliantly elegant
solution to me. But probably not applicable here, as GCJ doesn't really
fall into that category, given it still outperforms OpenJDK by the
factor of 10 on ppc.

There's a deeper issue. Projects like ours ours (Frysk) used gcj and related technology from the ground up. When Frysk was (and still is) being developed we used a lot of the newer/faster/better implementations of specific Java technologies that gcj brought with it, like CNI over JNI.

Now moving onto the brave new future things have changed. But that still requires specific tasks to be completed before the move from gcj -> IcedTea. The largest is converting CNI code to JNI code in projects that choose to use CNI. It's happening, but it takes times.

Regards

Phil

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux