Le vendredi 04 avril 2008 à 14:32 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit : > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 20:18 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > Anyway the damage is done, decent reporters will forgive the bug zapping > > project this time but you've just expended your error budget and will > > need to win a lot of credibility back before another mistake is > > forgiven. > > No, sorry, you don't get to pull crap like that. The Triage team's > plans were posted many times and ratified by the Triage team/QA and then > FESCo, and announced again. You had your chance at providing input and > making it "better". That's not crap that's reality. You can publish discuss get reviewed approved as much as you want that does not remove all responsibility if flaws are found in the approved plan once implemented. An approval and review procedure never changed the fact that ultimately the person or team doing a proposal had the most visibility and brainshare to spend on it. If it works out they get the fame. If not they get the shame. Bad karma can be earned back. Given the state our old bug triaging was the bug zapping team will have lots of opportunity to win good karma. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
