Le vendredi 04 avril 2008 à 05:41 -0700, Andrew Farris a écrit : > But what could be gained from trying to solve bugs in software that is long > modified to be unrecognizable from the state it was in then... Packaging problems persist even if the underlying software was updated many times. Next time do not flood reporters flood component owners (with a 'can we close this yes/no ?' if no answer do not close is assumed) since component owners are the ones asking to push stuff under the carpet and should at least perform some activity to get their wish. Anyway the damage is done, decent reporters will forgive the bug zapping project this time but you've just expended your error budget and will need to win a lot of credibility back before another mistake is forgiven. > Its regrettable that some bugs got left > behind when they did, but a bug filed against 'rawhide' in 2006 is obviously > obselete and you know this. A bug filled against rawhide in 2000 which had a comment in february 2008 is obviously not obsolete. What counts is activity not date of creation -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
