Re: bugzilla triage madness :-/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:41:58 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote:
>
>  > But what could be gained from trying to solve bugs in software that is long
>  > modified to be unrecognizable from the state it was in then...
>
>  You presume too much. The bot didn't examine whether the software/pkg
>  changed too much. The bot mass-changed tickets based on age/product.

How many email did you receive? Now multiply that by some small number
to accommodate for others like yourself... say 30. Now let say it
takes a person 5 mins to determine if bug against package foobar in
fc6 still exists in f8., so that's  150 * (num email you got). That's
easily a 24 man hours.

I received those email too. My ownly complaint was that I was somewhat
offended that Bugzilla felt the need to apologize to me. As if it
thought I was sensitive enough to get all anxious about the matter. I
simply verified that the issue existed in F8 and acted accordingly.

Also, there was a link to the wiki on how to join the  Bug Triage
program to make things go a bit faster/

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux