On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:18 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:04 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Good luck trying to get the installer to run on anything less than 512MB these days. > 512MB? Has Fedora's installation requirements become this kind of poor? > > But correct, installing Fedora on low memory systems has always been a > PITA. Things have gotten worse with every release. 256 should be doable[1]. 192 is in the "maybe" range, we swing back and forth some on it just based on some external pressures and I just haven't had a chance to try it. davej just got recently burned a bit by two bugs[2] that were hurting the installer's memory usage a bit. Jeremy [1] With swap [2] One was that we hadn't gotten to moving stage2 out of RAM yet. The other was that os.path.join has one entirely non-intuitive way of calling it... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
