Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:33:06 +0200, Mark scripst:
doesn't seem to add that much advantage. But i might be wrong..??
Yes, you are ;-). Even totally screwed up Apache server totally in hands
of script-kiddie via totally screwed up PHP release (not that it would
ever happen, just a theoretical example) cannot do more than it is
allowed to do by SELinux -- and that's not that much.
I think I remember a recent case for SELinux lowering the impact of a
_real_ security issue in one package.
I wanted to blog about it but could not find it anymore :(
There are several. Refer to the mitigation news section in
http://tresys.com/selinux/
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
