Harald Hoyer (harald@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Bill Nottingham wrote: >> It's a bad spec, and the way that it's done I don't really see how it's >> fixable. >> >> Bill >> > > Work with the Linux Foundation on a new/revised sane LSB spec? > > http://www.linux-foundation.org/snapshots/booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic.html#INITSCRCOMCONV I'm not certain the spec could be 'fixed' while remaining backwards compatibility; users would still expect $network, $local_fs, $named to do something they really can't. Also, considering that a number of these concerns were raised before the very first version of the spec was approved... Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
