Re: Parellel boot and audit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 01 April 2008 09:18:22 am Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > Using the LSB headers, how do I express that audit needs to start before
> > just about everything else? The only things I can think of that could be
> > before audit are irqbalance, cpuspeed, iptables, ip6tables, netlabel,
> > network, bind (optional), and syslog. The irqbalance and cpuspeed are
> > questionable, though.
> >
> > -Steve
>
> The bad thing, you can't specify "run before" in LSB syntax.

If we are switching in F9, we need this fixed before release.


> Something all other services require and the script provides is needed for
> that to work. Yes, it's a known shortcoming and the LSB syntax should be
> extended.
>
> Someone working with LSB?

If so, have them to ask why audit is not a standard facility like syslog.

-Steve

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux