Re: Fedora (again) forces me to disable SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark wrote:
Also if i )as a user) run a application and a attacker
strikes that application than the attacker still can't do more than i
as a user can do so it doesn't seem to add that much advantage. But i
might be wrong..??

Yes, you're slightly wrong there. Compromised software can be far more destructive than you'd initially think. If you can't delete a file, that doesn't mean broken and exploited software can't do it while you run it.

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB  5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29
 revoked key 0xC99B1DF3 no longer used
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux