Re: Fedora (again) forces me to disable SELinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



IMHO, it is much easier to keep selinux on for servers web or email ... etc, that it is for desktop style machine, where you expect to do anything and everything. But interactive users run in unrestricted specifically for that I guess!

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not many servers seem to be sending smolt stats. (57% desktop, 20%
laptop, 21% "unknown", 1% server according to those pages add all
unknown to servers, and it is still only around 22% of reported
setups.)

>From those 50% that have it turned off, I would guess a lot have it
off because of either past needs, or for following a "guide" advising
this.

I have used SElinux as the default setting since it started. Apart
from a few cases (iirc, there were at some point conflicts with ntfs
mounts...) it has been almost plain sailing for me. (I am however,
mostly a windows user...)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux