On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 21:22 +0100, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: > Fedora doesn't care if this is harder or easier. I proposed here many > things, which could improve Fedora, but they were rejected. And they all were rejected with reasons and explanations of why they are not suitable for Fedora - be it legal issues or deviation from upstreams, etc. These directly counter the goals of the Fedora Project as a whole. Granted, they almost certainly would improve Fedora in the short-term for many; but they would just as certainly harm us as a whole. We want to make things easy and simple, yes. In fact, we LOVE doing this. But doing so in a manner that is legally-dubious (proprietary drivers or non-Free codecs, etc.) or pushes us _away_ from proper community involvement (such as significant upstream deviations) is simply not feasible for us. > That's the reason I'll switch to openSUSE quickly. Probably after > release of 11. Big improvement from 10.3. From the start of openSUSE, > it's getting better than Fedora and leaves the stereotypes in the past. I've heard good things about OpenSUSE, but from my trials with it in KVM last year, it's quite a beastly thing at first. To each his own, I suppose. =) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
