On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Well for FLOSS at least we could do it. But have you read the second > part of Steve's suggestion? That about packaging beecrypt into their > application? Of course Fedora will still contain more crypto libraries > than 1 or 2 for many future releases but what about other distros? I for > example don't see much probability in having beecrypt included in future > RHEL releases. HAHA. Somebody working for Fedora Project which is always telling not to ship a private library but always use the system one suggests such a thing to me? And I don't care about other distributions and well, beecrypt could end up in a future EPEL release - even if I've to maintain there myself ;) Greetings, Robert -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
