On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Robert Scheck <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > HAHA. Somebody working for Fedora Project which is always telling not to > ship a private library but always use the system one suggests such a thing > to me? And I don't care about other distributions and well, beecrypt could > end up in a future EPEL release - even if I've to maintain there myself ;) If the beecrypt upstream is dead....and you are wanting to do this primarily to support a closed source application that won't be in Fedora.... is maintaining this in Fedora appopriate? I'm not sure it is. If you un-retire this package, I believe this will be prelude to a discussion concerning whether Fedora should insist on there being an 'active' upstream for the component. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
