On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:57:55PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Well for FLOSS at least we could do it. But have you read the second > part of Steve's suggestion? That about packaging beecrypt into their > application? Of course Fedora will still contain more crypto libraries > than 1 or 2 for many future releases but what about other distros? I for > example don't see much probability in having beecrypt included in future > RHEL releases. Well, I think RHEL has to care about third-party and/or non-FLOSS software even more than Fedora, so I could imagine that RHEL users want to keep beecrypt longer than you think. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
