Felix Miata wrote:
On 2008/03/10 17:25 (GMT-0500) Les Mikesell apparently typed:
Duane Clark wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
I think most users of disks more than a little under 20G would ultimately be
unhappy with that. I think I'd skip separate /home if HD size less than 19G.
So, something like this:
less than 19G -> up to 1G swap, balance /
19G-35G -> 8G /, up to 2G swap, balance /home
more than 35G -> 12G /, up to 4G swap, balance /home
I would go way beyond that. Don't users install additional applications?
I have more than 30GB of applications installed, though I will admit
that is probably far from typical. I think for under 80GB of space, it
should be a single partition. Over that, if you are going to go for this
crazy scheme ;), make / at least 20G.
I'd split at around 40G, with 20 for /.
20G is about 5 times the max usage of any of my 50 or so / partitions. I
don't think average users with separate homes need even 10G for /, and the
rest of the users know what they need and will custom partition regardless of
any default proposal. Maybe add a 4th level with 80G+ disks given 20G for /.
+1
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
