Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:38:04PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:45 -0600, Colorado Rob wrote:
That seems a bit presumptuous:
rpm -q totem-nautilus-xine
package totem-nautilus-xine is not installed
rpm -qa | grep totem
totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
totem-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
totem-pl-parser-2.21.92-1.fc9.x86_64
totem-mozplugin-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
These are all rawhide packages.
rpm -q --whatrequires totem
totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
rpm -q --whatrequires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
no package requires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
I'm certainly happy to entertain suggestions and delve deeper into this.
But let's not jump to any conclusions before all the facts are in.
Eh, I was close. It's totem-nautilus for you. You have it installed.
It requires the version of totem you have installed. However there is a
new totem available as an update, and that new totem doesn't have a
totem-nautilus subpackage. So yum tries to upgrade totem, and in the
process finds a broken dep on the installed totem-nautilus. Since
totem-nautilus doesn't exist in rawhide anymore, the rawhide report
doesn't find a dep problem.
So totem needs an "Obsoletes: totem-nautilus <= lastversion-of-totem-nautilus"
right?
Looks like the totem build last done in koji failed, so I wouldn't jump to
conclusions without looking at its changelog (I didn't) unless you're sure it
was supposed to remove totem-nautilus permanently.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
