On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:38:04PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:45 -0600, Colorado Rob wrote: > > That seems a bit presumptuous: > > > > rpm -q totem-nautilus-xine > > package totem-nautilus-xine is not installed > > > > rpm -qa | grep totem > > totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > totem-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > totem-pl-parser-2.21.92-1.fc9.x86_64 > > totem-mozplugin-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > > > These are all rawhide packages. > > > > rpm -q --whatrequires totem > > totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > > > rpm -q --whatrequires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > no package requires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > > > I'm certainly happy to entertain suggestions and delve deeper into this. > > But let's not jump to any conclusions before all the facts are in. > > Eh, I was close. It's totem-nautilus for you. You have it installed. > It requires the version of totem you have installed. However there is a > new totem available as an update, and that new totem doesn't have a > totem-nautilus subpackage. So yum tries to upgrade totem, and in the > process finds a broken dep on the installed totem-nautilus. Since > totem-nautilus doesn't exist in rawhide anymore, the rawhide report > doesn't find a dep problem. So totem needs an "Obsoletes: totem-nautilus <= lastversion-of-totem-nautilus" right? -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
