On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:45 -0600, Colorado Rob wrote: > That seems a bit presumptuous: > > rpm -q totem-nautilus-xine > package totem-nautilus-xine is not installed > > rpm -qa | grep totem > totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > totem-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > totem-pl-parser-2.21.92-1.fc9.x86_64 > totem-mozplugin-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > These are all rawhide packages. > > rpm -q --whatrequires totem > totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > rpm -q --whatrequires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > no package requires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64 > > I'm certainly happy to entertain suggestions and delve deeper into this. > But let's not jump to any conclusions before all the facts are in. Eh, I was close. It's totem-nautilus for you. You have it installed. It requires the version of totem you have installed. However there is a new totem available as an update, and that new totem doesn't have a totem-nautilus subpackage. So yum tries to upgrade totem, and in the process finds a broken dep on the installed totem-nautilus. Since totem-nautilus doesn't exist in rawhide anymore, the rawhide report doesn't find a dep problem. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
