On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 13:20 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 13:03 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > > What remains to be implemented is the Koji side of things. The idea is > > > that "make build" will run 'cvs commit; make tag koji', and that Koji > > > will have a database of package Release tags, and increment them itself > > > for each new build. It will generate the %changelog section from the > > > CVS changelog between the last tag and the new one. > > > > We really don't want koji writing back to the CVS server. There is a > > lot of benefit to koji having only readonly access to the source > > control. > > This system wouldn't require koji writing to the CVS server. Sorry, I misread that. Still, why would you pull from koji instead of the cvs server itself? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
