On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:15:16 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > Most the jpp packages I looked at seemed fine. Which ones didn't get
> > bumped right?
>
> They all got bumped to m+1jpp.something instead of mjpp.n+1.
This is supported in cvs now.
According to the Wiki, the numbering scheme seems to be
Xjpp.Y%{?dist}
where Y is to be bumped and X is the original jpackage release.
$ bumpspecfile.py jpackage-utils.spec
-2jpp.9%{?dist}
+2jpp.10%{?dist}
Also added in cvs is a fallback, where a release string that doesn't
match at all is tried to be bumped at the very right, and if that
is not possible, ".1" is appended.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
