On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:44:42 +0100 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And still nobody has said what script was used to bump the spec files. > The one in cvs/fedora originally came from either notting/sopwith and > was improved for the fedora extras mass-rebuilds. It could be > enhanced to support the jpp scheme and also add a > "bump-least-significant" fallback for any "invalid" versioning > schemes. But if a different and secret script is used, that's not > helpful. I used the one that was mentioned on list very recently, from cvs/fedora/rebuild-scripts. Most the jpp packages I looked at seemed fine. Which ones didn't get bumped right? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
