On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:32:00 -0500, Matt Wringe wrote:
> > > > In this case I have gdl 0.9-0.pre6.fc9. It got bumped to
> > > > 0.9-1.pre6.fc9. It should be 0.9-0.pre6.fc9.1.
> > >
> > > However, it should have been
> > >
> > > 0.9-0.1.pre6%{?dist}
> > > ^^
> > > (!)
> > >
> > > to begin with, not
> > >
> > > 0.9-0.pre6%{?dist}
> >
> > that is correct. Your original scheme did not follow the guidelines,
> > thus the bumper didn't deal with it as if it were a pre-release.
> > Please follow the guidelines next time.
>
> I have also noticed that all the jpp based java packages have been
> updated incorrectly, and those are following the fedora jpackage package
> naming guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy
And still nobody has said what script was used to bump the spec files.
The one in cvs/fedora originally came from either notting/sopwith and was
improved for the fedora extras mass-rebuilds. It could be enhanced to
support the jpp scheme and also add a "bump-least-significant" fallback
for any "invalid" versioning schemes. But if a different and secret script
is used, that's not helpful.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
