Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > What do you suggest to fix that? What do you feel is wasting > > resources? > >> This causes "current fedora" to be of "suboptimal quality" > > Without concrete examples and measurements, it is very hard to fix > > this. > So, how would you obtain the measurements, which are the obvious first > step? Some sort of interactive poll, either on a web site or a > program that posts the results. Fedora can look at Bugzilla logs, download logs (specially about updates), access to their webpages, monitor what "the press" says, ... No need for a (very unreliable!) "please answer this webpage's poll, if you happen to wander this way and feel like it". > >> and causes people to ask for "Fedora LTS". > > Non sequitur. > On the contrary, it follows perfectly from developers that don't > know/care about the end user perception/experience. Even worse. If the perception is that "developers don't care", why would the perception about some LTS /handled by the same volunteers as a sideline/ be any better? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
