Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:50:41AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: [...] > > And why aren't those reasons satisfied with RHEL/CentOS which doesn't > > have these problems? > I would help for those who want to deploy fedora but don't want to > upgrade at the fedora pace. Fedora's definition /is/ bleeding-edge, fast-moving; thus shortish lifetime. Why would anyone want anything else under the Fedora name is beyond me. And there /are/ workable alternatives for longer lifetime, as has been pointed out repeatedly. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
