Re: long term support release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:50:41AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:

[...]

> > And why aren't those reasons satisfied with RHEL/CentOS which doesn't
> > have these problems?

> I would help for those who want to deploy fedora but don't want to
> upgrade at the fedora pace.

Fedora's definition /is/ bleeding-edge, fast-moving; thus shortish
lifetime.  Why would anyone want anything else under the Fedora name is
beyond me. And there /are/ workable alternatives for longer lifetime, as
has been pointed out repeatedly.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile               Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux