* Ralf Corsepius [25/01/2008 10:31] : > > Do you have the TBytes to host it, do you have dozens of mirrors, do you > have the bandwidth, do you have the man-power to administrate the > buildsystem? Were I interested in Fedora LTS, I'll start looking for server space and bandwidth (man-power isn't exactly a technical ressource). And, yes, I'm certain I could find enough to get started. > Have a look at rpmfusion - Despite they are working on it for months, > AFAICT, trying to copy/reuse the fedoraproject.org infrastructure it's > still not up. Is copying the Fedora infrastructure really the showstopper ? Last I heard, it was hardware problems and lack of man-power. > > the others. I don't remember Red Hat or Fedora promising they would address > > each and every one of them (and, in fact, I distinctly remember the opposite) > > and I suspect that neither do the people asking/demanding that LTS be > > implemented. > ?!? They would not ask if they wouldn't want it. Sorry, bad phrasing on my part. What I meant was : The people asking/demanding that LTS be implemented do not remember Red Hat or Fedora promising they would address all demands made of Fedora. > Actually, I assume most people being in real need for a RHL replacement > have quit Fedora long time ago. Well, I'm still here and Fedora fills my needs better than RHL ever did. Emmanuel "4.2 was nice, though" Seyman -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
