On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 11:05 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> > Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Than Ngo (than) wrote:
> >>
> >>> Index: qt.spec
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/qt/devel/qt.spec,v
> >>> retrieving revision 1.146
> >>> retrieving revision 1.147
> >>> diff -u -r1.146 -r1.147
> >>> --- qt.spec 26 Nov 2007 15:32:22 -0000 1.146
> >>> +++ qt.spec 23 Jan 2008 15:58:17 -0000 1.147
> >>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> >>> Summary: The shared library for the Qt GUI toolkit.
> >>> Name: qt
> >>> -Version: 3.3.8
> >>> -Release: 11%{?dist}
> >>> +Version: 3.3.8b
> >>> +Release: 1%{?dist}
> >>> Epoch: 1
> >>> -License: GPL/QPL
> >>> +License: GPLv3
>
> >> Make that,
> >> License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
> >> please, to match reality. qt is definitely not GPLv3 only.
>
> > I understand it is QPL/GPLv2/GPLv3 now...
>
> True (applies to qt4 as well), I forget the reason why we chose to omit
> QPL from the License: field before. There was one, I just don't recall atm.
It should be:
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3 or QPL
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
