Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Than Ngo (than) wrote:
Index: qt.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/qt/devel/qt.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.146
retrieving revision 1.147
diff -u -r1.146 -r1.147
--- qt.spec 26 Nov 2007 15:32:22 -0000 1.146
+++ qt.spec 23 Jan 2008 15:58:17 -0000 1.147
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Summary: The shared library for the Qt GUI toolkit.
Name: qt
-Version: 3.3.8
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Version: 3.3.8b
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Epoch: 1
-License: GPL/QPL
+License: GPLv3
Make that,
License: GPLv2 or GPLv3
please, to match reality. qt is definitely not GPLv3 only.
I understand it is QPL/GPLv2/GPLv3 now...
True (applies to qt4 as well), I forget the reason why we chose to omit
QPL from the License: field before. There was one, I just don't recall atm.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
