-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:16:30 -0900 > "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Legacy was not a failure... it was a key part of the process of >> defining what the limits are with the resources we have. Now that we >> have gone through that, the people who have survived the process have >> a much better idea of what it takes in terms of a resource commitment >> to pull it off. >> >> I have absolutely no problem with another attempt at community effort >> as a follow-up to what Legacy did. I just don't think its where this >> community of contributors wants to contribute. I think at a minimum >> there are 3rd support specialists out there with a business interest >> in a Fedora LTS, or perhaps niche hardware vendors in the embedded >> space which could be persuaded to leverage Fedora as a development >> platform. Lots of unexplored area. > > It's perfectly OK to fail, in fact we should fail more often, and share > the results of those failures. It's only by failure that we'll know > the limits of our abilities. Dude. That's deep. - -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHl7dTtO+bni+75QMRAjguAJwNYr51LtpO2To803vJrOgze6O7vQCfUjqL OJ3GbqiPVhjyCLMMmn/wmeo= =o6m0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
